Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Perry Kantor on Lia Purpura's "Autopsy Report"

Opening the Body

            Lia Purpura's “Autopsy Report” was a visceral and detailed recounting of her first experience watching a human body dissected.

The first page is rife with details of the state in which the bodies are found. Details like  “Drowned men, bound with ropes and diesel-slicked. Their ears sludge-filled. Their legs mud-smeared... their lashes white with river silt,” set the tone of the piece very quickly and efficiently. Purpura also doesn't waste time with certain conjunctions or prepositional phrases, which gives the piece a very condensed and fully-packed feel. On the first page every paragraph also starts with the phrase “I shall,” which instantly helps set the tone for who the speaker is.

As I began I wondered what direction the piece would take, as so many morbid details so clinically discussed began to make me wonder if perhaps it was about murder, or something truly sinister. It progresses on to recount the actual visit to what I imagine is either a medical examiners office or the morgue. I think at this point my fears that it was going to be something more gruesome (than it already was) were assuaged but I wasn't fully confident the speaker wouldn't turn to be a serial killer or something of the sort.

The part that seemed most honest to me was when the speaker tells us that the first time she sees a body opened up her reaction is to laugh. I find this honest because I highly doubt that would be most peoples first reaction and it also seems borderline inappropriate, which makes it all the more believable that it actually happened. But the key to the essay is the speaker's admission that to her the entire process of human dissection felt almost as if it were natural knowledge to her, as if she had always known that things would happen the way they did, “Of course blood pooled each blue-burnt circumference. Of course, I remember thinking.”

I think as a reader it made me consider visual detail in a different way, because I had never had things so vividly recounted in such a gory yet dispassionate way, as if it were a textbook describing viscera. It made me consider tone in a whole new light as well, and how even things normally very intense can be reduced. Her pithy writing also made it much easier to simply take in, there was no fluff to distract the reader from the story or the details and I think I could incorporate more of this technique into my own work. I liked that I didn't have to re-read a single line to understand what she meant by it, everything was as plain as it could be. 

As a writer I want to experiment more with tone and detail as a result of this piece. I want to see if I can achieve the same density of detail without compromising the tone I’m trying to work with. Purpura seems to accomplish this balance perfectly. She manages to combine her accurate and almost poetic recounting with very truthful comparisons: “The bladder, hidden, but pulled into view for my sake and cupped in hand like a water balloon,” while still maintaining an easily believable, almost objective, viewpoint. More of these obvious and easily identifiable analogies might also be something worth exploring in my own work.

5 comments:

  1. Interesting discussion here, Perry. Purupura is one of the leading writers on lyric essays, and I like that you've looked especially at her tone here, which definitely has the cold, calculating stare of an morgue worker or mortician. But, at the same time, she is able to make these aspects of the body (the clinical) interesting through her metaphors and her poetic language, which lifts the essay beyond pure observation and shows--in many small ways--how she personally is viewing and connecting to the events/images without her having to come out and say "Hey, here's what I think/feel about this."

    As for the tone, there's a kind of loosely followed rule in nonfiction, fiction, & poetry: the more intense an experience, or visceral the events, the less you have to dramatize these with your writing style (and vice versa). Think of any action movie you've seen: the characters don't spend the 10 minutes after the car explodes talking about how CRAZY it was that the car exploded. Rather, the car exploding (or the person being shot, the rooftop jump, whatever your cliche) acts as the dramatic "hook" all by itself.

    I wonder what you think, overall, the purpose of this piece is. What universal theme, larger idea, is Purpura trying to get at by her structure and style here? How do these fragments circle and hover around some bigger message?

    ReplyDelete
  2. As far as the purpose of the piece goes, I am honestly not sure. I think it is partly an exploration of Purupura's ability to analogize and partly an exploration into the narrators past for nostalgia. The larger idea seems to be that the past is always filtered through a lens, and Purupura's lens is very clear.

    Your comment on creating tension by using more a less description/drama relative to the power of the event itself is right on, and until you had pointed it out I had never noticed the inverse relationship between the two.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This piece was interesting. It kind of threw me off how she starts in list form, and then in the middle switches to regular essay form. The part where she laughs was so honest, but laughing during inappropriate times is usually a sign of being uncomfortable, so this didn't surprise me. Perry, you are right, this piece is full of detail, but no fluff. It's pretty much straight to the point. I think the part that was so descriptive that it had me thinking afterward, was the part where she's in the grocery store imagining all the shoppers bodies being dissected, and imagining what they look like inside. Also the part where she talks about the smell that was still lingering, even though she is talking about the rain, she brings it back to the hours before at the morgue. Very dark. I liked it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I feel that a really easy reading of this story was the author looking at what makes us all connected and how fragile we really are. We are all made up of the same parts, regardless of who we all are and and regardless of how it happens, we all end up the same way. I believe the author may have been looking for more in death and coming to realize that death is an equalizer. Human nature calls for ceremony and pomp in the event of death but ultimately it is all the same. The narrator asks for the dime to stay in the body as payment for the ferryman but this too is a ceremonious way of thinking. I feel that the author believes that reality is reality and society looks for a greater purpose or reason but that there really is none. We are all people, made of the same things and we are all "here" despite anything else and we all die is a very plain and ordinary way.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have to agree with Josh about what I believe the story is about. Life I feel is kind of like a braided essay in the fact that we all have our own stories but in the end we all end up dying. I think the author is trying to show that in life we may have our differences but in the end we are all the same.

    ReplyDelete