Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Luke Holland on Abigail Thomas's Safekeeping



             Abigail Thomas’s book, Safekeeping, follows the life of the author as she struggles to support her family and find love.  Thomas uses a form of “flash non-fiction” in which she writes short chapters about specific instances from her life.  The order of these snippets of her life at times seem random but also flows like a novel.  I found Thomas’s book to be a very interesting read due to the unique style that she implements and the way it flows from chapter to chapter.
            Thomas begins the book by describing her life before meeting one of her husbands.  She uses short, descriptive sentences to convey the feelings that she is remembering.  She changes her point of view from first to third person and at times even uses second person.  Since this is a work of non-fiction, the change in point of view may allow her to be truthful without revealing too much about her personal life, while also keeping the reader interested.  Thomas’s use of description and simile really jumped out to me when she describes a memory she had of her second husband, “A deity at breakfast, talking with his mouth full, and the crumbs shooting forth became the stars and galaxies.”  By describing her second husband’s mannerisms in such a way, the creative side of Thomas’s memories becomes apparent.  The fact that she associated something as complex as stars and the galaxies with such a mundane act like chewing with your mouth open portrays the authors deeper insight into her experiences.  Thomas’s descriptive writing continues as she begins to tell the story of her life.   
            As the book continues, the story reads more like a novel as the author begins to describe her various marriages and how her life unfolds.  She gives in depth description into the culture of the mid to late twentieth century and further portrays her change from a naïve girl to an “experienced” adult.  Her story unfolds slowly through her emotional depictions of numerous events in her life.  In my opinion, the epitome of her emotions occurs after her father’s death when she receives his stone collection, “She couldn’t open them.  She wanted the moment to be right; she didn’t want to do this just any-time; she was waiting to feel in the exact center of something.”  By expressing her emotions through this one experience in her past, the author effectively appeals to her audience.  The idea of sentimental value gives Thomas a sense of meaning and leads to self-reflection.  However, she unceremoniously opens the stones in the next paragraph, which shows her humanity. 
            I thoroughly enjoyed Safekeeping because the author adequately appealed to my emotions through her memoirs.  The purpose of non-fiction is to give something to your audience and Thomas does so through her use of honesty and self-expression.  She utilized a unique style, which was hard to follow at times but ultimately leads to a thoughtful and enjoyable story.          

10 comments:

  1. I like this analysis, and I'd be interested to know a few more things regarding Safekeeping:

    1. What is this "something" that we are meant to give the audience, and what is that specific "something" in Thomas's case? What does she hope the reader to take away from the work as a whole? What is the value of her portrayal here?

    2. I'd be interested to know why you think this flows like a novel. Is it the voice? the descriptions? And what is it that separates a novel from a memoir like this?

    3. Although I think it's definitely true that Thomas utilizes different POVs (third-person & first-person) to keep the piece from feeling too personal, even nostalgic, I wonder what further message/theme this switching between POVs displays. How does it affect the audience? Our sense of her character and development as a woman, mother, and human being?

    ReplyDelete
  2. To respond to Adam's comment, I wanted to address the flow of the novel. I don't think it is so much the flow of the book which makes it read like a novel, considering the fragmented nature of many of the relayed experiences. Instead, I think it feels that way because, as in a novel, we feel as though we have taken a journey with the author and seen them through trauma. I always remember J.R.R. Tolkien's rule of writing realistic characters, which stated that they needed to suffer and be rewarded for their suffering. I think Beard's "reward" is her perspective on life, which is relayed in the book.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I loved the "flash non-fiction" style. I think the style kept the reader interested, because it wasn't just one long chapter after another, but small pieces that would keep the readers' focus. I liked how you said, "Since this is a work of non-fiction, the change in point of view may allow her to be truthful without revealing too much about her personal life, while also keeping the reader interested." I think that is an interesting point, since I have been having the issue lately of revealing too much in the personal life. Thomas did this very tastefully. The changed point of view was very clever. It think it was great how she did this without confusing the reader. I think she was very creative in doing so, and I also think it would be kind of a hard thing to do as a writer.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm not sure that I felt the character received the reward for their suffering. And while life has its ups and downs I don't know how strong a tone of suffering I got from the story. I think the fragmented style actually sometimes took away from the punch of the novel or the punch of serious moments because they were shortened, but not really condensed.

    As for the change in point-of-view, I agree with Mr. Holland that Thomas did this effectively, though at times it felt at odds with my conception of non-fiction.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In terms of the "something" that Thomas gives to the readers, I felt she often wrote this collection as much for herself and for her children as she did for the audience. I enjoyed reading this because I hadn't read such and in depth example of flash non fiction before, and really liked the way such short fragments can illuminate a much larger picture without boring the reader. However, besides an enjoyable read I did not feel that I really took "something" significant away from her experiences.
    The story of her life itself and explorations of love, loss, and seeking fulfillment I find to be very universal and transferable themes.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I really enjoyed reading this novel and I especially liked the style in which it was written. I found the themes to be very universal, as some have mentioned, but I also found them to be a good thing; I believe writing is something that you do not only for yourself, but for others too. It is an expression of thoughts and feelings- ones that others may relate to. That is the “something” that I took away from this story; I, and many others, can relate to this story. Maybe not every part, or maybe just one, but something. There more to the words on the page than what meets the eye, and that is what I most enjoy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I really did not care much for this book. I did feel that the author did a very good job at exemplifying the fragmented style and gave the class a clear picture on how to employ this technique. I also agree that a fragmented style benefits greatly and is used to its utmost potential when the fragments are in deep scenes. For me, I felt greatly alienated as a reader, in part due to my gender and in part due to some strongly held opinions that run contradictory to everything shown consistently throughout this book. I felt the switching of POV's to do several things: first, I believe by utilizing the first person, the author is able to connect on a deeper and more intimate level with readers who may sympathize greatly with these experiences. Secondly, by jumping out and into third-person, the POV gives the reader a sense of looking in from the outside and therefore attempts to allow those of us who may not connect so deeply to the material a way of seeing the situation and forming connecting opinions. For me, I found no way of connecting and was disappointed by the character portrayed throughout the piece and their lack of growth. I feel the author did a good job employing the fragmentation technique and the switching of POV gave everyone a way of looking at the story differently.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I enjoyed reading this book; especially because it was my first experience with flash non-fiction. The short fragments kept me interested in the story and I felt it worked really well with the way she was expressing her memories to the audience.
    The shifts in the point of view was at first confusing for me. When I first came across a shift from first person to third person I actually had to go back and re-read some sections to make sure I hadn't missed something. After getting used to these shifts, I realized that they did serve a greater purpose. I thought the use of first person conveyed a deeper sense of honesty and really allowed her to express her thoughts and feelings and to move the story forward. The jumps to third person seemed to pull the author away from herself and allowed her to analyze herself as if she was an outsider (or the audience) looking in to her life. Sometimes it seemed like the author didn't know how to explain some of her actions entirely so jumping out to the third person perspective allowed her to make judgement on herself as if she were a stranger.

    ReplyDelete
  9. In response to some of Adams questions, I believe that Thomas sought to use her stories to provide the reader with a newfound taste for life. Since she jumps around a lot through the utilizing flash fiction, we don't see the same character in each chapter. Sometimes we see an elderly and caring woman and other times we see a naive young woman. I think that the story flowed through the authors voice and recurring themes throughout the memoirs. The author constantly struggles throughout her life, which takes an empathetical approach in attracting the reader.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I loved "Safekeeping," it was a very interesting read from start to finish. At first, I wasn't a fan of the switches in point of view, sometimes making it seem as the author was the speaker, and other times making it seem as though the perspective was coming from another lady. But after a while I caught on, and I think it was really interesting the way she did that. I think it was kind of a way for her to look at past events as if they happened to someone else, which gave the events a new light. I also liked the tone throughout the piece, and I liked that she never stayed on one subject for very long. "Safekeeping" is definitely a book I will be reading again sometime.

    ReplyDelete