As I started reading this essay I had
no idea where it was headed. I was under the impression that this writer was
writing about her dull, somewhat lonely and sad life. The first thing I noticed
was the ways she described certain things, almost in a poetic way. This happens
immediately in the second line, “…as I row my boat through a dim, complicated
dream”. I think it is lines like this that makes this piece creative
non-fiction, opposed to non-fiction. The way the writer draws the reader in by
descriptive and stimulating words. She begins her story talking about her helpless,
dying dog. There is a part in the second paragraph where she is standing
outside in the middle of the night waiting for her dog to pee, and she is
describing the night sky in a way only somebody familiar with astronomy could
describe it. Looking back, she is foreshadowing a major part of the story.
Jo Ann
Beard has followed the “street-car” rule in a way, when it comes to this
non-fiction piece. The essay is very well organized. It starts with the dying
dog, the stars, and the night sky. It continues with other main points along
the way, but ends with the dying dog, stars and the night sky. It does a
perfect loop, yet by the end there is a totally different meaning and feeling.
As the
story progressed, I started to feel bored. She talked about the squirrels in
the spare bedroom, her “missing husband” who constantly and pathetically called
her, her dull job that she really had no passion for, and then her co-workers.
The squirrels and missing husband did have a bit of an interesting storyline,
added a bit of kookiness to her otherwise boring life. I liked how she
described bits and pieces of those stories because they had interconnectedness.
The squirrels were loud and noisy, uninvited, living in the spare bedroom where
all of her husband’s belongings were quietly out of the way. Little did I know
in the beginning that these miniscule parts of the story would end up having a
mighty emotional role in the end of the piece.
When Beard
speaks of her work, she speaks as if she didn’t belong. She was just there
because it was a job, but she didn’t have the passion that the others had for
physics. She just knew how to put together a journal. She speaks of her
co-workers; Some she doesn’t have a close relationship with, but works side by
side with them everyday, but seems to know them on a personal level none the
less. She has a passionately awful relationship with one person in particular,
Bob. They constantly butt-heads, argue, and slam doors. Bob is best friends
with the person Beard is closest with, “I spend more time with Chris than I
ever did with my husband”. She talks with Chris about everything, her dying
dog, her missing husband; and he shares his life with her, his depressed
mother, his crazy dog.
The way
Beard eventually explains her co-workers came as a bit of a surprise to me, but
was intriguing. She explained each of their personalities in a negative way,
through the eyes of a student that worked with them, Gang Lu. The first time
reading this piece, I found the way Beard explains Gang Lu’s emotions a bit odd.
How did she know what he was thinking? How did she know that “he’s sick of
physics and sick of the buffoons who practice it”? Then she starts describing
her co-workers through Gang Lu’s eyes, all in a negative connotation. (Little
did I know that there were letters that Gang Lu had written, letters I am
assuming Beard got the inspiration or information to make these assumptions of
Lu’s emotions towards his life and his co-workers).
Then the
turn of events happens. Beard says, “It’s November 1, 1991, the last day of the
first part of my life”. As I’m reading I try to figure out what the big event
is that is going to change this woman’s life so drastically. Then, she starts
to write of the shooting. It kind of comes out of nowhere, but if I would have
been paying attention to all the foreshadowing in the previous pages, I
probably could have caught on quicker. She explains it in timeline form,
describing where each person is sitting when they get shot, where they get
shot, the smoke that comes from the gun, the actions of the surrounding people,
the next steps Gang Lu, the shooter, takes. The description is fast, like the
gunshots. It took twelve minutes to shoot everyone on his list. That is a short
amount of time in real life, and only takes about a page in the book to
describe the incidents.
From then
on she describes her denial as she starts to hear the news. Describes her
numbness, how her mind goes blank, how she tries to convince herself that none
of this has happened. She tells herself that Chris is not amongst the dead. But
he is, and she is numb.
The first
thing she finds comfort in is her dying dog. It seemed like the reason she kept
him alive all this time was for this moment. She needed him, and he was there
for her just like she had been throughout his dying days. Next, her husband,
who hasn’t shown his face in who knows how long, shows up at the door. He hugs
her and tells her he is there for her. The part I found the most emotional was
towards the end when she describes standing at the bottom of the stairs waiting
to hear the scurrying of the squirrels that she had kicked out of her house
shortly before all this. She was waiting to hear them, and sadly she remembered
they were gone. “Silence. No matter how much you miss them. They never come
back once they’re gone”.
The essay ends with her lying at night with her arm on her dying dog, propped up so that she can see the night sky and planets through her window.
The essay ends with her lying at night with her arm on her dying dog, propped up so that she can see the night sky and planets through her window.
This essay
was composed in a perfect circle, or route I should say. It started with the
dog in the night and the stars in the sky. Went on to talk about her husband, the
squirrels, her work and co-workers. Co-workers went to shooting of the
co-workers, then back to the husband, the squirrels, the dying dog, and the
night sky.
If I take anything from this essay, it will be Beards amazing yet sly way of foreshadowing. The second time reading the essay, I caught on to the foreshadowing and how it left a sense of eeriness. I also liked how she described people through others eyes, whether it be through Gang Lu’s, Chris’, or her friend Caroline’s. Out of everything, I like how the story ended up interconnecting and making its way back to where it originally started. She tied this essay back up perfectly, in a way that the reader felt a connection with her because she had walked you through it all before.
If I take anything from this essay, it will be Beards amazing yet sly way of foreshadowing. The second time reading the essay, I caught on to the foreshadowing and how it left a sense of eeriness. I also liked how she described people through others eyes, whether it be through Gang Lu’s, Chris’, or her friend Caroline’s. Out of everything, I like how the story ended up interconnecting and making its way back to where it originally started. She tied this essay back up perfectly, in a way that the reader felt a connection with her because she had walked you through it all before.
This is a great analysis, and I agree with you that foreshadowing is a huge benefit to the writer--especially an essayist. The idea behind any essay is that we have something to SAY, something to TEACH, something to provide the reader that they couldn't find themselves (or at least, not as conveniently) in the outside world.
ReplyDeleteForeshadowing, such as Beard's inexplicable "entry" into Gang Lu's thoughts (how does she know this? we wonder; and why is this guy important?) helps hint that this character will play an important part of the essay in the future (which, obviously, he does). This is the same technique that a lot of filmmakers use when they focus that extra second on a face, object, etc: a kind of wink for the viewer, hinting that there's a mystery here that's yet to be solved, something significant the writer/filmmaker knows and we don't. It's this irksome need to solve equations, to find solutions, to simply KNOW what's what that gives a lot of momentum to the viewer/reader.
It's great that you picked up on this technique in "Fourth State...", Dominique, and saw it's value in the work. Kudos.
I have to agree with you on your feeling that this was going to be a “dull” piece. I, too, had a hard time getting into. I actually read your post before I finished reading this essay. Your remarks about the foreshadowing urged me to finish reading. As I read more, the foreshadowing was more noticeable.
ReplyDeleteAfter finishing the piece, I understood the somber tone throughout her writing. I think in the beginning she was feeling as though her life was not that great, perhaps feeling like she was stuck in rut. Next, this tragedy happens. Then it ends with her back where she started, same life, yet now a different person.
In keeping with the rest of the comments, I also found the piece dull at the outset. However, by the end I was riveted, and I think that says a lot about Beard's ability to tell stories. One aspect of the story that really stuck with me that I haven't seen mentioned is the humanity of it and how personal this experience was to the author. The emotions of the speaker are so expressive and well-developed that I felt like I knew her by the end.
ReplyDeleteI see how you found the essay dull at times, as I did too. However, when I found myself getting bored or distracted I found that it really helped me to pause and re-enter the piece with the mindset of exploring her emotional landscape. Though the essay does chronicle actual actions, the focus is almost completely on her reactions, feelings, and ruminations. She uses a lot of beautiful figurative language that can be under appreciated if read too fast or for the purpose of "getting to the action". When I first finished reading I thought "Why does she make the interesting part so short, and so late?" By interesting I meant the drama of the shooting. But upon further consideration I realized that the essay wasn't about the shooting, it was about her and her internal drama. The way you approach reading a piece is more important than it seems.
ReplyDeleteI really like Dominique's analysis of this piece because after initially reading it I did not connect it as a circle, the way the pieces fit together and echo one another. If it weren't for this echoing effect that Beard creates beautifully in her essay, I would think that the "It's November 1, 1991, the last day of the first part of my life..." would actually make a better opener than her opening about her dog. Yet I see how it fits together. I can see now after our class about braided essays how this might definitely be categorized as braided, especially from the beginning when she jumps so abruptly from the scene about her dog to the squirrels to going into work.
ReplyDeleteBesides her writing style, maybe it's just my own lack of science/physics courses in my life, but I did not know that plasma was considered a fourth state of matter. I looked it up and upon realizing it to be true I actually thought it a really smart title and liked the way she described her situation as being in the "plasmapause",
I would list this in my top three essays read this semester. I too really enjoyed her poetic style and foreshadowing and would like to applaud her on the natural way she braided so many different personal aspects of her life together in order to build one a single story. I really found the squirrels in the attic to be a very powerful section. I enjoyed how the the rodents, perhaps, could be seen as doubts or maybe lingering emotions that were nesting in the memories (old junk) in her attic. I liked how it took her friend to help clear them out for good (because friends are essential for that) but that later on she did miss them.
ReplyDeleteI also really liked how she used her struggles with her husband and her dogs failing health as a way to portray her transitioning. I feel that her finding a new beginning in the so much death is powerful and that, in a way, a reader might view it as a complete wiping of the slate to start fresh. As I said before, this is easily within the top three essay I have read this semester and I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.
I also found this piece to be boring at the beginning mainly because I wasn't sure where it was heading. Once I finished reading it though I realized that I really liked it. I loved how it made a complete circle and ended with her seemingly back where she started, yet with pretty much her entire life drastically changed.
ReplyDeleteI also found it interesting how instead of just describing how Gang Lu shot his colleagues in a way that would normally be on the news, the author described the shooting from his point of view. The author made Gang Lu a person who was disillusioned and felt hopeless. This differentiated him from the crazy and psychotic killer he would be portrayed as in the media and instead gave him a motive and made him seem almost a victim himself.
When we read this essay early in the semester, I completely fell in love with it. Later, after we'd examined the lyrical essay form, I felt there were aspects of a lyrical thread in this piece. While the essay as a whole told a linear story in a relatively straightforward way, Beard laced it with an extended metaphor of the plasma, the amber, the stuff of consistencies we can't understand but fascinates us to no end (probably because we can't understand it). She draws this, without ever explicitly stating the connection, as her way of coping with death - something we don't understand, that is other and beautiful and sad all at once.
ReplyDeleteOverall, I like this style, and think it takes subtle skill to incorporate lyrical elements into a traditionally structured essay.